SOURCEBOOK

EASI Articles

Annotated Output | Correlations

Computer Output

The tables of descriptive statistics can be used to assist in calculating the correlation.

Summary Statistics for the Data

               N       M      SD    Skew    Kurt
Outcome1   4.000   2.000   2.449   0.544  -2.944
Outcome2   4.000   6.000   2.449   0.544  -2.944

Covariances for the Data

         Outcome1 Outcome2
Outcome1    6.000    3.000
Outcome2    3.000    6.000

Correlations for the Data

         Outcome1 Outcome2
Outcome1    1.000    0.500
Outcome2    0.500    1.000

The table of inferential statistics shows the key elements to be calculated.

Hypothesis Tests for the Correlations

                          R      SE      df       t       p
Outcome1 & Outcome2   0.500   0.612   2.000   0.816   0.500

Calculations

Descriptive Statistics: The descriptive statistics are calculated separately for each variable.

Sum of Cross Products: The Sum of Cross Products (“SCP”) is not easily determined solely from the summary statistics of the output, but rather from the data.

\[SCP = \sum ( X - M_X ) ( Y - M_Y ) = ( 0 - 2.000 ) ( 4 - 6.000 ) + ( 0 - 2.000 )( 7 - 6.000 ) + ( 3 - 2.000 )( 4 - 6.000 ) + (5 - 2.000)(9 - 6.000) = 9.000\]

Covariance: The Covariance (“COV”) is a function of the Sum of Cross Products and the sample size:

\[COV = \frac{SCP}{(N - 1)} = \frac{9.000}{(4 - 1)} = 3.000\]

Pearson Correlation Coefficient: The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (“r”) is a function of the Covariance and the Standard Deviations of both variables:

\[r = \frac{COV}{(SD_X) (SD_Y)} = \frac{3.000}{(2.449) (2.449)} = .500\]

APA Style

Correlations provide a measure of statistical relationship between two variables.

For the participants (N = 4), the scores on Outcome 1 (M = 2.00, SD = 2.45) and Outcome 2 (M = 6.00, SD = 2.45) were moderately correlated, r(2) = .50.

Note that correlations can also have inferential information associated with them (and that this information should be summarized if it is available and of interest).

For the participants (N = 4), the scores on Outcome 1 (M = 2.00, SD = 2.45) and Outcome 2 (M = 6.00, SD = 2.45) were moderately but not statistically significantly correlated, r(2) = .50, 95% CI [-0.89, 0.99], p = .500.